Ethereum Founder Vitalik Buterin Calls Governance Token Speculation Pathological

Vitalik Buterin has taken a controversial stance on governance tokens, arguing that governance is not a good reason for such tokens to be treated as valuable.

The notion of governance rights as a narrative for why a token should be valuable is pathological, Buterin wrote on Twitter Tuesday. You’re literally saying, I’m buying $X because later on someone might buy it from me and a bunch of other people to twist the protocol toward their special interests.

On the Ethereum network, governance tokens are a type of ERC-20 token typically issued by a DAO or decentralized community to be used as digital voting chips for various community proposals. The more tokens a person holds, the more voting power they have.

Buterins stance expresses an anxiety around governance tokens being hoarded or sold for profit so that entities could effectively control protocols, a move that goes against the principle of decentralization. Hes also against speculating on the perceived future value of a governance token.

But not all tokens are created equalsome have uses that extend beyond just voting power. For example, ApeCoin is used for more than just governance. While ApeCoin was initially launched with the framing that it would be a governance token airdropped to Yuga Labs and its NFT holders to provide voting rights for its new ApeCoin DAO, traders actively speculate on the tokens price and trade it just like they would Bitcoin or Ethereum.

ApeCoin then became accepted as a form of payment for Yuga Labs NFTs and upcoming game Otherside, and Gucci announced back in August that it would accept the currency in some of its stores.

Even as Buterin implores crypto users to reconsider the perceived value of governance rights, its unlikely there will be a massive shift in trader behavior.

Stay on top of crypto news, get daily updates in your inbox.